| Strategic Objective | Key | Performance Measure | Unit of Measure | Target (Actual) | Strategies/ Initiatives |
| Baseline | 2007-08 | 2008-09 Target | 2008-09 Actual |
| 1.1 Improve the Graduation Rate | | Graduation rate vs. GA average | % =/- | -10.4% | | 70% | | Credit Recovery utilizing NovaNET on site during and after school and at the PLC |
| | Students Graduating with Reg Diploma | % | 59.6% | 64% | 70% | | Provide GHSGT Reviews/Enhancement; Provide prescriptive remediation for students who do not pass the GHSGT |
| | Students who drop-out for total enrolled 9th grade Grad Class of 2009 | #-% | | | 4% | | Continue to implement and offer Read 180 (Reading Program) for identified struggling readers to include Special Education students |
| | Percent of failed Core Classes recovered through NovaNet (Fall through Summer) | % | | | 40% | | Collaboration between Counselor and Migrant Education Liaison |
| | Students on track after 2nd semester -1st time 9th graders (7 of 8 units) After Summer | # - % | 91/112--81% | 124/155--80% | 85% | | Provide Math Support for struggling math students After School Tutoring for all disciplines |
| | Second year students on track to Graduate after summer ( 2nd semester) - 10th grade (14 of 16 units) | # - % | 106/126--84% | 94/126--86.2% | 85% | | GHSGT Test Prep class for targeted students in areas of weakness |
| | Percent of class taking SAT/ACT (Seniors) | # - % | 61 - 14% | 71 - 14.6% | 15.0% | | Continue to offer Summer School (9-12) for Credit Recovery and keeping students on track to graduate |
| | MHS SAT/ACT score (avg) of Class | # | 1372 | 54/1384 | 1394 | | Utilize the Advisor-Advisee Program and Career Center to promote post-secondary options |
| | Gifted students identified | # - % | 67- 15.5% | 33 - 6.8% | 44-8.5% | | Performance Learning Center enrollment to individualize instruction for non-traditional learners |
| | Total Dropout Rate | #/% | | 24/4.2% | 21/3.8% | | On-site joint enrollment with Swainsboro Technical College |
| | | | | | | | Tiger Time used to enrich and remediate Differentiated Instruction with emphasis on literacy |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Strategic Objective | Key | Performance Measure | Unit of Measure | Target (Actual) | Strategies/ Initiatives |
| Baseline | 2007-08 | 2008-09 Target | 2008-09 Actual |
| 1.2 Improve Student Mastery of GPS | | Teachers gifted certified | # - % | 3 - 7.8% | 5-11.3% | 6-13.9% | | Differentiate Professional Learning based on teacher needs |
| | Honor Graduate Students | # | 13 | 21 | 21 | | Incorporate OAS for quarterly reviews of GPS to increase EOCT scores |
| | Gain on GOSA performance index | # | +3 | | Information Not yet available | | Continue using USA Test Prep for EOCT and GHSGT Monitoring Inclusion classes in Core Areas to meet inclusion standards. Monitoring study skills classes for quality. |
| | Number of inclusion classes | # | 5 | 12 | 17 | | Summative Assessments Enhance student vocabulary |
| | AYP English GHSGT | % | 90.40% | 86.4% | 90.0% | | Continue contract with Dana Sparkman to coach and assess co-teaching instruction |
| | AYP Math GHSGT | % | 75.50% | 71.8% | 75.0% | | Continue training with District School Psychologist to develop Tier 2 interventions and progress monitoring tools |
| | Students passing Eng. GHSGT | % | 98.0% | 84.0% | 90.0% | | Encourage interdisciplinary collaboration among Core and CTAE classes |
| | Students passing Math GHSGT | % | 92.0% | 86.0% | 75.0% | | (Also includes strategies listed in section 1.1) |
| | Students passing science GHSGT | % | 67.0% | 82.5% | 85.5% | | |
| | Students passing Soc. St. GHSGT | % | 78.0% | 71.0% | 78.0% | | |
| | Students passing GHSWT | % | 91.0% | 89.0% | 93% | | |
| | EOCT scores Algebra I | % | 59.0% | 59.0% | 63.0% | | EOCT vs State Averages-G.Rotton/W.Salter |
| | EOCT scores Geometry | % | 41.0% | 46.0% | 55.0% | | |
| | EOCT scores English I | % | 53.0% | 56.0% | 60.0% | | |
| | EOCT scores English III | % | 69.0% | 69.0% | 72.0% | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Strategic Objective | Key | Performance Measure | Unit of Measure | Target (Actual) | Strategies/ Initiatives |
| Baseline | 2007-08 | 2008-09 Target | 2008-09 Actual |
| 1.2 Improve Student Mastery of GPS cont. | | EOCT scores Physical Science | % | 60.0% | 60.0% | 63.0% | | (See 1.1 strategies listed previously) |
| | EOCT scores Biology | % | 61.0% | 59.0% | 62.0% | |
| | EOCT scores Economics | % | 66.0% | 37.0% | 50.0% | |
| | EOCT scores US History | % | 54.0% | 48.0% | 55.0% | |
| | Students enrolled in AP English | # | 14 | 15 | 16 | |
| | Students enrolled in AP US History | # | 9 | 8 | 11 | |
| | Students scoring 3 and above on AP English exam | % | 50.0% | 4/15-27% | 30.0% | |
| | Students scoring 3 and above on AP US History exam | % | 50.0% | 3/8-38% | None Enrolled0% | |
| | | | | | | |
| 1.3 Reduce Achievement Gaps | | Black Students Graduating with Reg Diploma | # - % | 12 - 42.9% | 24 - 51.1% | 30/46=63.8% | |
| | Hispanic Students Graduating with Reg Diploma | # - % | 4 - 33.3% | 8 - 53.3% | 9/13=70% | |
| | Black HS students meeting GHSGT Math | # - % | 22 - 64.7% | 17 - 44.7% | 67.0% | Need Junior Class Break Ethnic break down |
| | Econ Disadv HS students meeting GHSGT Math | # - % | 44 - 66.7% | 36 - 59.0% | 74.9% | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Strategic Objective | Key | Performance Measure | Unit of Measure | Target (Actual) | Strategies/ Initiatives |
| Baseline | 2007-08 | 2008-09 Target | 2008-09 Actual |
| 1.3 Reduce Achievement Gaps cont. | | Econ Disadv HS students meeting GHSGT ELA | # - % | 58 - 87.9% | 49 - 80.3% | 87.7% | | Establishing a mentoring program for identified at-risk students during the Advisor-Advisee program |
| | SWD passing the GHSGT Science | # - % | 5 - 40% | 7 - 53.0% | 4/7=57% | |
| | SWD passing the GHSGT Math | # - % | 5 - 20% | 5 - 35.7% | 4/7=57% | |
| | SWD passing the GHSGT Social Studies | # - % | 5 - 20% | 6 - 40.0% | 4/7=57% | |
| | SWD students passing GHSGT English | # - % | 6 - 83% | 6 - 42.9% | 4/7=57% | |
| | Students in PLC | # | 10 | 30 | 35 | |
| | | | White students graduating | # - % | 43 - 69.4% | 51 - 76.1% | 57/69=83% | | |
| | | | Econ. Disadvantaged Students graduating | # - % | 28 - 49.1% | 46 - 57.5% | 60% | | |
| | | | SWD students graduating with Reg Ed. Diploma | # - % | 11 - 73.3% | 2 - 13.3% | 5/14=37.7% | | |
| | | | Students graduating with a special ed. diploma | # - % | 4 - 26% | 5 - 5.4% | 3/14=21.4% | | |
